<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lights Out Films &#187; Film Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alexmestas.com/lightsoutfilms/category/film-reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alexmestas.com/lightsoutfilms</link>
	<description>Monkeys, Movies, Mayhem</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:03:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Escape from Mars</title>
		<link>http://www.alexmestas.com/lightsoutfilms/film-reviews/escape-from-mars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alexmestas.com/lightsoutfilms/film-reviews/escape-from-mars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 03:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crappy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scifi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexmestas.com/lightsoutfilms//?p=515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Note: Please forgive me if some of what I&#8217;m writing sounds familiar. Mystery Science Theater has seeped so deeply into my brain that I can no longer distinguish between my original thoughts and ones stolen from the now cancelled show. This article is more of a blow by blow account of emotional attack I felt, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone" style="margin: 5px; float: left;" title="Escape from Mars Poster" src="http://www.alexmestas.com/lightsoutfilms/images/film_escapefrommarsposter.jpg" alt="" width="175" height="322" />Note: Please forgive me if some of what I&#8217;m writing sounds familiar. <strong>Mystery Science Theater</strong> has seeped so deeply into my brain that I can no longer distinguish between my original thoughts and ones stolen from the now cancelled show. This article is more of a blow by blow account of emotional attack I felt, than an actually review.</p>
<p>Just in case you&#8217;re wondering. This is going to be one of those reviews for a movie that I have no intention of watching carefully, and that isn&#8217;t worth your time. Frankly I&#8217;d be surprised if anyone in the creation of this film actually sat down and watched it.</p>
<p>We start with probably the most surprising moment of the film &#8211; a title-card saying it&#8217;s a film from Paramount Pictures. I need to check that that isn&#8217;t spelled Paramounntt or something like that. I just checked again. That&#8217;s Paramount. They made <strong>Indiana Jones</strong>. And apparently <strong>Escape from Mars</strong> as well.</p>
<p>A too-pretty-and-young-to-be-an astronaut tells us why she isn&#8217;t scared of flying to Mars. I&#8217;m not really listening, but I assume it has something to do with kittens, yarn and the artwork of Mary Englebright. That&#8217;s the kind of stuff that girls talk about, after all.</p>
<p>Mission Control looks like it was apparently built in my mom&#8217;s basement. And it&#8217;s staffed by the same people that work  at the natural food market by my house: a bevy of long haired, glassy-eyed hipsters.</p>
<p>Is anything really &#8220;starring&#8221; Christine Elise? I think I recognize some of the actors in this film, but it&#8217;s hard to know with their clothes on. It&#8217;s a SkinMax&#8217;s stab at legitmate filmmaking. At least in those Cinemax movies, you know you&#8217;re making something bad. Ten minutes into the movie, in Cardboard Control, some hippies argue about bringing the shuttle back. Shouldn&#8217;t they have discussed this before they launched the most ambitious space mission in human history. Nice that they cram all of this exposition into such a small space. That must mean that there&#8217;s going to be a  ot of action in the rest of this movie. Yup. Just waiting for that action to start.</p>
<p>Oh great. Along with all this space cheesiness, they slap on some flashbacks featuring meeting rooms that look like a dot.com cubicle. Jesus. Even the memories have to be this boring? One of the most important tennets of Robert Rodriguez&#8217;s Theory of Low Budget Filmmakng, is that you should load the front half of the movie with action. It&#8217;s bound to keep people interested. <strong>Escape from Mars</strong> makes no such attempt. This is a movie for the those unfortunate people with spinal cord injuries who can alone not change the channel.</p>
<p>Drifting in space, a crew member makes a veiled reference to the fine music of Nirvana. Yet the music coming out of the headphones sound more like the music Yanni would create by violent slapping his butt cheeks together. I don&#8217;t really remember Nirvana using flange guitar and sythesizer in their compositions.</p>
<p>Uh-oh. Someone said aboot. I smell the bacony stink of a Canadian production. I know this is a joke from <strong>Mystery Science Theater 3000</strong> because it is one of my favorites. I don&#8217;t hate Canada but I generally hate Canadian movies that try to be American. As the ship spins aimlessly in space, the captain announces that he&#8217;s getting a divorce from an earthbound wife. Wait, let me write that again. He&#8217;s getting a divorce. Their systems are going down and he&#8217;s talking about his love life. Yup. I don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s wrong with the ship, because the screenwriter was sleeping on his very-easy-job again.</p>
<p>These astronauts apparently do nothing more than hangout in the AV room and doodle on sketchpads. If this is what the future holds, then count me in. I guess they solved their problem with the ship, because they&#8217;re running on the treadmll and doing the crosswords. The Russian&#8217;s astronaut&#8217;s accent turns from Eastern European to Sicilian at the drop of a very bad method acting hat. Also note: there is more than one reference to the Russian and vodka. It&#8217;s simply obligatory for any movie ever made.</p>
<p>Now the divorce is taking center stage. They threaten to pull the mission because of a divorce? Man, weird. Couldn&#8217;t they think of a better plot point than that? You know what this reminds me of? It reminds me of the time when I told you about the hippies talking in Cardboard Control about pulling the mission. It&#8217;s a lot like that. The hippies must be Catholic, because they&#8217;re very adverse to anyone being divorced before landing on the Red Planet.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s some kind of explosion which is just an excuse for them to hide the flimsy sets under a haze of rave-like fog. Even during the explosion, the crew sits in the AV room, while the one man without a mask attempts to fix all of the systems.</p>
<p>And why even bother with the stock footage of the 1984 Olympics, huh fellas? We&#8217;ll take your word for it that lots of people want to see the Mars landing.</p>
<p>Man this is a bad movie. There&#8217;s no real point. It plays more like something in the background of the natural history or space museum or some such shit like that. Then two astronauts step on Mars at the same time. And this is supposed to be exciting? I suppose it&#8217;s all leading up to something big at the end there. Well, only 40 mins to go&#8230;Slowly my mind is turning to mush. I can&#8217;t see straight, I can&#8217;t think straight. Why am I watching this? It&#8217;s fifty times worse than <strong>Assault on Dome 4</strong>. At least that had some semblance of a plot (although one ripped off from <strong>Die Hard</strong>).</p>
<p>On the surface of the planet, some of the astronauts enter a Tuff shed where they sleep at night. Kimberly is told that her husband has died at home. I don&#8217;t need to say that it&#8217;s against regulations to do so, but is nonetheless a requirement of movies such as this. Then the meteor shower hits. It&#8217;s as cheap as you can imagine. But instead of being excited I find myself lulled into a gentle sleep. I never thought I&#8217;d write this, but I long for the fatty- kung-fu antics of Steven Segal. <strong>Escape from Mars</strong> isn&#8217;t so much a movie as a collection of cheaply shot images and bad line readings. It&#8217;s hard to make fun of something in that nether region between terrible and incompetent. Damn<br />
you Canada. Damn you.</p>
<p><strong>Movie Grade: F-</strong></p>
<p><em>Year: 1999<br />
Written by: Peter Mohan and Jim Henshaw<br />
Directed by: Neill Fearnley<br />
Starring: Christine Elise, Peter Outerbridge and Kavan Smith.<br />
Details: 90 mins / Sci-Fi Network / Rated PG</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/asin/b00008yjdk/lightsoutfilm-20">Buy this instead and support Lights Out Films</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alexmestas.com/lightsoutfilms/film-reviews/escape-from-mars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evil Never Dies</title>
		<link>http://www.alexmestas.com/lightsoutfilms/film-reviews/evil-never-dies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alexmestas.com/lightsoutfilms/film-reviews/evil-never-dies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crappy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[horror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexmestas.com/lightsoutfilms//?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Year: 2003
Written by: A Whole Bunch of Losers
Directed by: Uli Edel
Starring: Thomas Gibson and Cathering Heigl
Info: 120 mins (with commercials) / TBS / Rated TV-14
&#8230; it just fades away.
Spoiler Alert: I give away everything about this made for TV movie, but not like it matters. You won&#8217;t (or shouldn&#8217;t rather) watch this. It&#8217;s bad for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Year: 2003<br />
Written by: A Whole Bunch of Losers<br />
Directed by: Uli Edel<br />
Starring: Thomas Gibson and Cathering Heigl<br />
Info: 120 mins (with commercials) / TBS / Rated TV-14</p>
<p>&#8230; it just fades away.</p>
<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.alexmestas.com/lightsoutfilms/images/thomasgibson.jpg"><img class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" src="http://www.alexmestas.com/lightsoutfilms//assets_c/2008/11/thomasgibson-thumb-150x187.jpg" alt="Thomas Gibson" width="150" height="187" /></a></span><em>Spoiler Alert: I give away everything about this made for TV movie, but not like it matters. You won&#8217;t (or shouldn&#8217;t rather) watch this. It&#8217;s bad for your soul. You will go to hell if you watch this.</em></p>
<p>This is one of those fine films from the boys at TBS. Made for TV, made for fun. I don&#8217;t know what it is about these kind of movies that so fascinates me. The made for TV format usually calls for a dumbed down script and a film easily cut into a tidy-commercial-break format. That has a way of limiting what you can do. Unfortunately, what they&#8217;ve done here is even worse than usual.</p>
<p><strong>Evil Never Dies</strong> stars Thomas Gibson formerly of one of the worst TV shows that ran for over four seasons, <strong>Dharma and Greg</strong>.</p>
<p>The basic gist: Detective Mark Ryan&#8217;s wife is killed in their home. It takes him a while, but he finally hunts down the killer and watches him as he&#8217;s put to death by lethal injection. All is well and good. Except for the fact that Detective Ryan is now drinking a lot and getting more cave-man like as the movie goes on. Thomas Gibson always seems to have some kind of befuddled look on his face, like the way a dog will cock his head to the side when they hear an unusual noise.</p>
<p>But of course, as we have learned from the title, <strong>Evil Never Dies</strong>. Well, in this case, it does die but it&#8217;s brought back to life by an idiot scientist and his impossibly shapely and attractive assistant (Katherine Heigl). Needless to say, this modern day Frankenstein begins wrecking havoc upon the unwary citizens of a small, Canadian-like hamlet. Note: he doesn&#8217;t go lumbering about like a proper monster should. Quite the opposite &#8211; he&#8217;s just a plain old human that likes to kill. You&#8217;d think that once getting brought back from the dead, you&#8217;d take a pretty low profile, get some hookers and go work in construction or something. Going around concocting overly-complex kidnapping and murder plans wouldn&#8217;t exactly be tops on my list.</p>
<p>For reasons only known to the plot gods, Gibson and Heigl end up as a team hunting down the evil monster lurking about. You know he&#8217;s evil because he has a widow&#8217;s peak and has dyed his hair dark black. Not only do Heigl and Gibson team up to fight evil (because it never dies, you know) they also team up in the sack in one of the most uncomfortable and unnatural love scenes in all of TV moviedom. They&#8217;re being stalked by a crazy, black haired freak, Det. Ryan has an warrant out for his arrest (don&#8217;t ask) and Heigl has been running around looking pretty and confused. So naturally, they must consummate their relationship in the middle of a stormy, plot-filled night.</p>
<p>Now the big twist. Near the end of the movie we find that&#8230;wait for it&#8230; Heigl&#8217;s character has been working with the killer all along! Oh&#8230;my&#8230;God! What a twist! What an amazing, original twist. I was so jaded and dulled by the rest of the movie that the mere reveal of her as a bad guy made me chuckle, shake my head disapprovingly and reach for another beer. Let&#8217;s just turn this movie off right now&#8230; oh&#8230; I have to watch the whole thing in order to review it. Really? The whole thing? But I know what&#8217;s going to happen ne&#8230;yeah. Journalistic integrity. I get it&#8230; but this is just a bad TV movie, I don&#8217;t have to watch that carefully right? OK. I guess I do &#8220;owe it to the filmmakers.&#8221;</p>
<p>The film was directed by Uli Edel &#8211; best known for other crappy TV movies, but mostly known for 1993&#8217;s fantastically naked bomb, <strong>Body of Evidence</strong> starring Madonna. Unfortunately, <strong>Evil Never Dies</strong> doesn&#8217;t feature any of the cheese that made that movie so enjoyable. And there&#8217;s no nude Madonna to drag us guys into watching it either. So we&#8217;re pretty much screwed on all fronts.</p>
<p>The idea with these movies should be to take the Bruce approach. You know it&#8217;s not going to be a good serious movie, so make it as cheesy and over the top as the market can bear. At least it&#8217;s fun for the audience. Why are they trying to punish us instead. No one should take something like this seriously. Not even the filmmakers. Not even Naked Madonna.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not as bad as <a href="http://www.alexmestas.com/lightsoutfilms//film_escapefrommars.html">Escape from Mars</a>, but it comes pretty darn close.</p>
<p><strong>Movie Grade: D</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alexmestas.com/lightsoutfilms/film-reviews/evil-never-dies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spider-Man 2</title>
		<link>http://www.alexmestas.com/lightsoutfilms/film-reviews/spider-man-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alexmestas.com/lightsoutfilms/film-reviews/spider-man-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 04:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superhero]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexmestas.com/lightsoutfilms//?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Year: 2004
Story: Michael Chabon
Written: Alvin Sargent
Directed: Sam Raimi
Starring: Tobey Maguire, Kirsten Dunst, Alfred Molina and James Franco
Details: 127 mins / Sony Pictures / Rated PG-13
Lucky for the film viewing public, this second installment of the Spider-Man franchise takes everything right with the first movie and improves upon it. The first Spider-Man was a great movie [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Year: 2004<br />
Story: Michael Chabon<br />
Written: Alvin Sargent<br />
Directed: Sam Raimi<br />
Starring: Tobey Maguire, Kirsten Dunst, Alfred Molina and James Franco<br />
Details: 127 mins / Sony Pictures / Rated PG-13</strong></p>
<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.alexmestas.com/lightsoutfilms/images/spiderman2poster.jpg"><img class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" src="http://www.alexmestas.com/lightsoutfilms//assets_c/2008/11/spiderman2poster-thumb-175x246.jpg" alt="Spider-man 2 Poster" width="175" height="246" /></a></span>Lucky for the film viewing public, this second installment of the Spider-Man franchise takes everything right with the first movie and improves upon it. The first Spider-Man was a great movie &#8211; a competent and exciting film, deftly directed and finely acted for a superhero movie. But it almost seemed like it wasn&#8217;t big enough.</p>
<p>Even though the film has some serious caliber acting talent (I&#8217;ll get to that in a second), the real star of the show is director Sam Raimi. We all know and love the man&#8217;s low budget movies, most especially Evil Dead. But with the first Spider-Man, he was forced or chose to tone down his signature style for a more straightforward blockbuster-action oriented approach. With Spider-Man 2, Raimi brings back his unabashedly frenetic style. In one tremendously exciting sequence, Doc Ock&#8217;s arms madly attack doctors in manner lifted directly out of Evil Dead 2. With no music in the background, we see huge optical zooms, blood and shaky-cam as the horror-hag screams of terror fly through the soundscape. <!--</p>
<p style="padding: 2px; line-height: 15px; width: 175px; float: right; background-color: rgb(192, 192, 192);">Would you like to be <a href="http://www.msu.edu/%7Ehaleysco/spiderman/" mce_href="http://www.msu.edu/%7Ehaleysco/spiderman/"><br />
Spiderman</a>?&nbsp; Well we can&#8217;t make you <a href="http://www.rockvillemd.gov/climbinggym/" mce_href="http://www.rockvillemd.gov/climbinggym/">climb walls</a>, but we can make you look like him!! The Costume Super Center has <a href="http://www.costumesupercenter.com/" mce_href="http://www.costumesupercenter.com/">Halloween costumes</a> of all kinds. Check out our Spiderman and <a href="http://www.costumesupercenter.com/category/boys+costumes/star+wars.do" mce_href="http://www.costumesupercenter.com/category/boys+costumes/star+wars.do">star wars costumes</a>!&nbsp; We have everything you need to play dress up at our <a href="http://www.costumesupercenter.com/" mce_href="http://www.costumesupercenter.com/">costume store</a></p>
<p>&#8211;>Hell, there&#8217;s even a prominently displayed chainsaw that gets put to some great use. This sequence is so exciting that I giggled with fan-boy laughter. Alone, this is well worth the price of admission.</p>
<p>This time out, Spider-Man is having some serious thoughts about being the spandex clad web-shooter, namely because it&#8217;s keeping him from his real love, Mary Jane. Of course, there&#8217;s another bad guy on the loose, in the form of a mechanized octopus guy that Harry Osborne (James Franco) is funding now that he&#8217;s in control of his late father&#8217;s company. Yes, the setup is similar to the first movie (accident causes scientist to become deformed, MJ is put in danger, and Spider-Man must rescue her), but then again, what superhero movie DOESN&#8217;T conform to such plot elements?</p>
<p><img style="margin: 5px; float: right;" src="http://www.alexmestas.com/lightsoutfilms/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/film_spiderman21.png" alt="spiderman2 image 1" />How the sequel differentiates itself from the first movie is through and increased reliance on strong action sequences, while still being able to maintain a very solid story and nice dialogue. Yes, the movie was worked on by a Pulitzer winning author and although the script for this film isn&#8217;t going to win a prize of similar level, it is well written and enjoyable.</p>
<p>As always, Tobey Maguire is perfectly cast, this time as the extremely disillusioned version of Peter Parker. He has a series of bad things go worse for him in this film, and Maguire encapsulates that pathetic nature that helps to sell the story. Also good is Kirsten Dunst, in a role admittedly light on the show off moments, but solid and pretty. Who I really loved, though, was Alfred Molina, independent film actor extraordinaire. As Doc Ock, Molina makes an empathetic figure, a victim as much as much as anyone. Oh, and James Franco is pretty good too as the tortured Harry Osbourne, son of the first Green Goblin. There are some nerd-worthy hints on what&#8217;s to come as he recedes darker into his hatred of Spider-Man, the one that killed his father.</p>
<p>Spider-Man 2 is one of the better sequels you&#8217;ll find, and even more importantly, one of the best superhero movies ever made. A visual feast, with some great acting and exciting, breathtaking directing.</p>
<p><strong>Movie Grade: A</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/asin/B00005JKCH/lightsoutfilm-20">Buy Spider-Man on DVD and Support Lights Out Films</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alexmestas.com/lightsoutfilms/film-reviews/spider-man-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transformers</title>
		<link>http://www.alexmestas.com/lightsoutfilms/film-reviews/transformers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alexmestas.com/lightsoutfilms/film-reviews/transformers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 02:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michaelbay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexmestas.com/lightsoutfilms//?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Year: 2007
Directed by: Michael Bay
Written by: John Rogers, Roberto Orci &#38; Alex Kurtzman
Starring: Shia LaBeouf, Megan Fox, Josh Duhamel, and John Turtturo
Although a nerd of the usual variety, I hold no sentimental spot in my heart for Transformers. I loved the toys, watched the cartoon, had my fun and grew up. I wasn&#8217;t afraid that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Year: 2007<br />
Directed by: Michael Bay<br />
Written by: John Rogers, Roberto Orci &amp; Alex Kurtzman<br />
Starring: Shia LaBeouf, Megan Fox, Josh Duhamel, and John Turtturo</strong></p>
<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.alexmestas.com/lightsoutfilms/images/transformersposter.jpg"><img class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" src="http://www.alexmestas.com/lightsoutfilms//assets_c/2008/11/transformersposter-thumb-175x262.jpg" alt="Transformers Poster" width="175" height="262" /></a></span>Although a nerd of the usual variety, I hold no sentimental spot in my heart for <strong>Transformers</strong>. I loved the toys, watched the cartoon, had my fun and grew up. I wasn&#8217;t afraid that Michael Bay was going to &#8220;ruin&#8221; the film. After all, there&#8217;s only so much to ruin of a television show that was created for the sole purpose of selling toys. So too the film: when the first title you see says &#8220;Hasbro presents&#8221;, you can expect even an enthusiastic crowd to titter at the thought.</p>
<p>No big deal after all. Plot is but mere happenstance in a Michael Bay film; a vehicle by which to carry big action sequences, hot girls and in which dialogue only serves to fill the silence between large explosions.</p>
<p>The plot that does exist finds Sam (Shia LaBeouf) the recipient of a magical car which takes him on adventures, appearing to be possessed by the devil, only to be revealed later to be a, yes, Transformer. The Transformers have come to earth to retrieve the &#8216;allspark&#8217; &#8211; a magic macguffin cube that will turn every mechanical device on earth into a Transformer if the evil Megatron has his way.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s all you need to know.</p>
<p>I knew exactly what I was getting into going to see <strong>Transformers</strong>. It&#8217;s crafted by the feathered hair of demolitions expert Michael Bay, whose love of giant crashes is equaled only to his obsession with beautiful young women too perfect to exist in the real world. The only thing I didn&#8217;t know was how big or how or how dumb the action.</p>
<p>The answer? Rather big and rather dumb. But it doesn&#8217;t come as much as a surprise. And after all, how cerebral can you get about a movie that promises giant fighting robots from a distant mechanical planet? Talk about suspending your disbelief. Besides Shia LaBeouf&#8217;s typically great performance as an uncomfortable teenager, you have to suspend your disbelief at nearly every turn. Suspend, suspend, suspend. Oh let me count the ways you&#8217;ll have to ignore that little voice in your head.</p>
<p>Beautifully rendered and amazingly realistic, you&#8217;ll have to suspend disbelief when the robots start doing shtick like out of the Keystone cops and telling jokes. It&#8217;s strange and rather unnecessary. Shouldn&#8217;t they be stoic protectors from beyond? And don&#8217;t get me started on the Transformer who apparently only watched BET in the early 90&#8217;s and speaks in a jive unseen since the first season of The Fresh Prince of Bel Air. Also, apparently everyone in America drives a GM. There&#8217;s nary a Toyota in sight.</p>
<p><img style="margin: 5px; float: right;" src="http://www.alexmestas.com/lightsoutfilms/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/transformers_1.png" alt="Optimus Prome" />But nothing is more improbable then Mikaela, the character played by 21 year old Megan Fox. She&#8217;s straight out of every young male&#8217;s fantasy, particularly apt given the target of the film. With intense blue eyes and flowing dark hair, as Mikaela, Megan trots around in belly baring tops, with a mini skirt and a somewhat dull expression that allows you to project whatever sick fantasies that you may have about a high school junior. Sure, she loves jocks, but she might just fall for the big nerd who has giant robots as a friend. Of course. And she knows how to work on cars. And she gives whip smart retorts to robot witticisms and knows how to pout sexily. It&#8217;s the typical thing.</p>
<p>And yet despite all this and a running time that exceeds two and a half hours, <strong>Transformers</strong> proves to be exactly what you need on a hot summer day. Groundbreaking CGI, big battles in the streets, CIA analysts that look like Swedish models, car chases &#8211; big, dumb, improbable. Ignore all the plot holes big enough to drive an Autobot through, and have some fun.</p>
<p><strong>Movie Grade: C+</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alexmestas.com/lightsoutfilms/film-reviews/transformers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
